December 17 2018 19:12:01
News Photos Forum Search Contact History Linkbox Calendar
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
Good music that peop...
Covers that Rock
Great live performances
Hancock, Carlson and...
Gongumenn Racing
Fantasy Premier League
TTA on Boardgaming
FIFA World Cup 2018 ...
Funny stuff
Interesting stuff
Newest Links
FLATLINE: How The Am... (1)
Piers Morgan tries t... (3)
Brexit: Facts vs Fea... (0)
Are you fat? Just sh... (0)
In Defense of Columb... (0)
Best Montages of All... (5)
CineFix - All time t... (0)
How Steve Bannon's f... (0)
Airplanes and Spaces... (4)
The Stranger in the ... (0)
Random Photo
64 ára føðingardagurin

Member Poll
How do you like the new banner I made for Copenhell?

Wait, that was for Copenhell? I like it, let's keep it!

What's Copenhell? Let's go back to the old one!

Whatever, I want a completely new one!

You must login to vote.
InterestBound to happen

Grizlas on March 22 2018 10:14:48
Bound to happen, and in no way an argument against using automated cars, because:

1. according to the video:

and this analysis:

So doing some basic math here....

White center lines = 10' each

Empty space between lines = 30'

Distance traveled in FPS "Feet Per Second" at 35 MPH = 52.5'

Road gradient roughly 0%

Reaction distance = 34'

Breaking distance at 35 MPH - 62'

Stopping distance at 35 MPH - 100'

When the pedestrians shoes first become visible in the video there is approximately 59' between the car and the pedestrian, in 1 second the car will have already covered 52.5' of that gap leaving 6.5' left to stop the car.

In order for a human driver, or the driver in this car to have avoided this collision by merely hitting the brakes and traveling in a straight line, "as is the reaction when startled by something on the road" there would have needed to be at least another 127.5' of distance between the car and the pedestrian.

For all the posts and articles that I have seen bashing the driver and Uber because this could have been avoided, it really couldn't have, the laws of physics would not have even allowed this to have been avoided in the best possible scenario.

And to touch on the subject of their being street lights there, in many scenarios those street light reflections on your windshield can actually be quite obstructing depending on the glare, anyone living in an area with many street lights can probably attest to that as well.

Lesson of the day - Don't jaywalk in the dark.

It is clear, that a human would not have been able to react sooner than the automated car.

and 2:

there was a human safety driver in the damn car, who did nothing.
Vuzman on March 22 2018 12:16:58
I agree, but I wonder why the car didn't see her earlier (or, at all)?

The [Uber] cars themselves were packed with around 20 cameras, seven lasers, a GPS, radar and lidar, a technology that measures the distance reached by outgoing lasers so cars can “see” and interpret the action around them.

It's fair enough that the cameras didn't see her, but the radar and lidar surely should have detetcted her?
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.


Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Last Seen Users
Boddin 2 days
Anubis_fo 2 days
Vuzman 3 days
Norlander 3 days
fjallsbak 5 days
Laluu 1 week
Vester 2 weeks
You must login to post a message.

29/11/2018 16:58
I did what? Nei, tvætl smiley

29/11/2018 11:16
Gleði meg at síggja tykkum - Jóannes lovaði mær at halda ball 2. jólakvøld - veit ikki um hann minnist tað

28/11/2018 19:05
Eg eri í FO 21. dec - 5. jan

27/11/2018 23:20
Test succesfull smiley hehe.. smiley síggjast skjótt komi til fø 23 dec - 03 jan

19/11/2018 16:09
testing 123

12/11/2018 20:37
RIP Stan Lee smiley

11/07/2018 00:24
thx smiley

10/07/2018 13:37
Tillukku við degnum Griz

28/06/2018 16:08

27/06/2018 16:02
Judas Priest wasn't at Copenhell, dumbass!

Shoutbox Archive