September 08 2025 01:34:19
News Photos Forum Search Contact History Linkbox Calendar
 
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
Starship orbital lau...
Covers that Rock
Great live performances
AI discussion
new tab page
Good music that peop...
The MAGA chronicles
Stand up comedy
It's a trap!
The Tech billionaire...
Linkbox
Newest Links
How Comedy Became a ... (0)
Disney prog band tak... (0)
Will humanoid robots... (0)
a fan told Rainbolt ... (2)
The NBA Stat that Co... (0)
RIP Brent Hinds (0)
Some thoughts from K... (0)
real power (foundati... (2)
Rick Beato's Pop Mus... (0)
Sabine is so right a... (0)
Random Photo
Fuck everybody! you know?
Fuck everybody! you know?
Gongumenn in the rearview

Member Poll
Should I watch "The Rings of Power"?

Yes

No

LOL

You must login to vote.
Link
 CategoryLink
Rating
InterestSome solid programming advice imho
3

Comments
Vuzman on June 06 2019 08:41:31
This is just another way of expressing the ancient development principle of "Make it work, make it right, make it fast", also expressed as "Make it work, then make it better".

This is why we have TDD, refactoring, etc. It's definitely a good principle, but, to play devil's advocate, the functional requirements are fulfilled after the first step, so if you're on a deadline, why make it better, when it already works? Project leaders (and PO's, customers, etc.) have a notoriously hard time understanding why you need more time to do more work, when it already works!
Grizlas on June 06 2019 10:27:01
Short term will almost always win out over long term in competitive business scenarios, I think. At least - that is my experience smiley

It is hard to justify the extra time, especially if there is any doubt at all about the future of the product.

But what I like most about this, is the more general idea of not committing yourself to a certain design before later on. I think this is a common mistake many companies make. Take, for instance, the area of 2nd generation nuclear reactors and especially molten salt reactors. There are about 20-30 competing designs already in development, that all have in common the fact that they cant get regulatory approval, because they haven't been tested in a real fission environment - something of a catch-22. On the other side, you have some researchers from the Netherlands that have no design yet, but are instead trying to get a simple salt loop placed inside the pool of an existing reactor, so they can study molten salt chemistry and how materials react to it. Their argument is, that you cannot make a good reactor design until you understand the quite complex chemistry, metallurgy etc. of the materials involved. I think this is the better approach - get as far as you can without committing to a specific design, so that you, later on, can make better decisions.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Login
Username

Password



Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Last Seen Users
Torellion00:25:50
Vuzman05:34:56
OKJones05:48:23
Norlander08:13:11
Grizlas 1 day
fjallsbak 2 days
Spiff 1 week
Vester 3 weeks
hendrikfo 3 weeks
Aliennizer 6 weeks
Obituaries
You must login to post a message.

Grizlas
05/09/2025 14:40
RIP Giorgio Armani!

OKJones
04/09/2025 16:17
Obituaries LOL! smiley

Grizlas
25/08/2025 11:40
Southpark s27e03 is worth checking out - hilarious

Grizlas
14/08/2025 07:48
this one is also pretty slick

Grizlas
07/08/2025 16:52
Agreed

OKJones
07/08/2025 14:24
This banner is the best so far

Grizlas
25/07/2025 07:25
works with no issues in normal version of Firefox. I'm guessing you either did not do CTRL+F5 or are using some adblock plugin.

Norlander
25/07/2025 04:52
Use Firefox and it blocks all sorts of unwanted stuff of course.

Grizlas
24/07/2025 14:57
Using some ad-blocker? Try ctrl+F5

Norlander
24/07/2025 12:25
its mostly just grey for me...