April 23 2025 08:55:07
News Photos Forum Search Contact History Linkbox Calendar
 
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
Good music that peop...
Covers that Rock
AI discussion
Starship orbital lau...
The MAGA chronicles
Stand up comedy
It's a trap!
The Tech billionaire...
Covers that never sh...
Besti ella størsti ...
Linkbox
Newest Links
Eivør analysed by W... (0)
SNL Weekend Update: ... (0)
Deadline: Forsvarsmi... (0)
Jon Stewart on Trump... (0)
Sheriff: Gene Hackma... (2)
Ferris Bueller's day... (0)
Interstellar travel ... (0)
Laks er lort (0)
Keypmannahavn í 197... (0)
Atheist biologist ca... (0)
Random Photo


CPH Party

Member Poll
Should I watch "The Rings of Power"?

Yes

No

LOL

You must login to vote.
Link
 CategoryLink
Rating
InterestBound to happen
4

Comments
Grizlas on March 22 2018 09:14:48
Bound to happen, and in no way an argument against using automated cars, because:

1. according to the video: https://twitter.com/TempePolice/status/976585098542833664?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloomberg.com%2Fnews%2Farticles%2F2018-03-21%2Fpolice-release-video-of-fatal-uber-autonomous-car-collision&tfw_site=technology

and this analysis:


So doing some basic math here....

White center lines = 10' each

Empty space between lines = 30'

Distance traveled in FPS "Feet Per Second" at 35 MPH = 52.5'

Road gradient roughly 0%

Reaction distance = 34'

Breaking distance at 35 MPH - 62'

Stopping distance at 35 MPH - 100'

When the pedestrians shoes first become visible in the video there is approximately 59' between the car and the pedestrian, in 1 second the car will have already covered 52.5' of that gap leaving 6.5' left to stop the car.

In order for a human driver, or the driver in this car to have avoided this collision by merely hitting the brakes and traveling in a straight line, "as is the reaction when startled by something on the road" there would have needed to be at least another 127.5' of distance between the car and the pedestrian.

For all the posts and articles that I have seen bashing the driver and Uber because this could have been avoided, it really couldn't have, the laws of physics would not have even allowed this to have been avoided in the best possible scenario.

And to touch on the subject of their being street lights there, in many scenarios those street light reflections on your windshield can actually be quite obstructing depending on the glare, anyone living in an area with many street lights can probably attest to that as well.

Lesson of the day - Don't jaywalk in the dark.


It is clear, that a human would not have been able to react sooner than the automated car.

and 2:

there was a human safety driver in the damn car, who did nothing.
Vuzman on March 22 2018 11:16:58
I agree, but I wonder why the car didn't see her earlier (or, at all)?

The [Uber] cars themselves were packed with around 20 cameras, seven lasers, a GPS, radar and lidar, a technology that measures the distance reached by outgoing lasers so cars can “see” and interpret the action around them.


It's fair enough that the cameras didn't see her, but the radar and lidar surely should have detetcted her?
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Login
Username

Password



Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Last Seen Users
Torellion00:20:21
OKJones17:49:18
Norlander 1 day
Grizlas 3 days
Boddin 3 days
Vuzman 1 week
fjallsbak 5 weeks
Spiff15 weeks
Vester16 weeks
Laluu35 weeks
Obituaries
You must login to post a message.

Grizlas
01/01/2025 00:37
Takk, somuleiðis!

Norlander
31/12/2024 23:30
Gott nýggjár!

Grizlas
06/11/2024 20:17
Finally.

Norlander
05/11/2024 13:14
tta finally works again

Vuzman
26/08/2024 07:45
Try the google search box

Grizlas
24/08/2024 23:30
doubtful

OKJones
24/08/2024 22:08
does the search function even work?

Grizlas
24/12/2023 15:06
Gleðilig jól

Norlander
24/12/2023 10:09
Gleðilig jól!

Norlander
29/10/2023 19:16
:/