September 12 2025 17:25:29
News Photos Forum Search Contact History Linkbox Calendar
 
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
Starship orbital lau...
Covers that Rock
Great live performances
AI discussion
new tab page
Good music that peop...
The MAGA chronicles
Stand up comedy
It's a trap!
The Tech billionaire...
Linkbox
Newest Links
News too depressing?... (0)
How Comedy Became a ... (0)
Disney prog band tak... (0)
Will humanoid robots... (0)
a fan told Rainbolt ... (2)
The NBA Stat that Co... (0)
RIP Brent Hinds (0)
Some thoughts from K... (0)
real power (foundati... (2)
Rick Beato's Pop Mus... (0)
Random Photo
Bratt lendið
Bratt lendið
Útferð í­ Stakkin

Member Poll
Should I watch "The Rings of Power"?

Yes

No

LOL

You must login to vote.
Link
 CategoryLink
Rating
AwesomeFTL
5

Comments
Grizlas on September 22 2011 23:52:11
Now lets see if anyone can reproduce the result. Like someone said: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Laluu on September 23 2011 01:04:56
If i understood the science guy on the BBC correctly, it's unlikely to be replicated elsewhere anytime soon because of the facilities needed. But they've done it 15,000 times over several years, so it's not exactly a freak result.
Grizlas on September 23 2011 06:30:40
But they've done it 15,000 times over several years, so it's not exactly a freak result.


They've detected neutrinos going faster than light 15000 times, or they have run the experiment 15000 times without getting this result?
Torellion on September 23 2011 06:48:24
That 'someone' was fucking Carl fucking Sagan, you barbarian!
Grizlas on September 23 2011 07:09:43
Here's the paper for those who like to dig deeper:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1109/1109.4897.pdf

EDIT: I've answered my own question. The measured neutrino velocity is the average of about 16000 observations over the last 3 years.

Despite the large significance of the measurement reported here and the stability of the
analysis, the potentially great impact of the result motivates the continuation of our studies in
order to investigate possible still unknown systematic effects that could explain the observed
anomaly. We deliberately do not attempt any theoretical or phenomenological interpretation of
the results.
Laluu on September 23 2011 08:29:25
@Torellion - I missed the introduction and wasn't wearing glasses, but I always figured Sagan was older. This guy looked about 40.
Vuzman on September 23 2011 09:05:25
That 'someone' was fucking Carl fucking Sagan, you barbarian!

+1
Boddin on September 23 2011 12:30:03
Who?
Vuzman on September 23 2011 13:13:33
Einstein responds:

Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Login
Username

Password



Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Last Seen Users
fjallsbak03:15:06
Torellion03:44:03
OKJones19:31:25
Norlander22:53:09
Grizlas23:32:22
Vuzman 1 day
Spiff 1 week
Vester 3 weeks
hendrikfo 4 weeks
Aliennizer 6 weeks
Obituaries
You must login to post a message.

Grizlas
05/09/2025 14:40
RIP Giorgio Armani!

OKJones
04/09/2025 16:17
Obituaries LOL! smiley

Grizlas
25/08/2025 11:40
Southpark s27e03 is worth checking out - hilarious

Grizlas
14/08/2025 07:48
this one is also pretty slick

Grizlas
07/08/2025 16:52
Agreed

OKJones
07/08/2025 14:24
This banner is the best so far

Grizlas
25/07/2025 07:25
works with no issues in normal version of Firefox. I'm guessing you either did not do CTRL+F5 or are using some adblock plugin.

Norlander
25/07/2025 04:52
Use Firefox and it blocks all sorts of unwanted stuff of course.

Grizlas
24/07/2025 14:57
Using some ad-blocker? Try ctrl+F5

Norlander
24/07/2025 12:25
its mostly just grey for me...